• Towards a Moscow-Ankara axis?

    On August 9th, Russian President Vladimir Putin received his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan in St. Petersburg’ ...

  • Attack in GAZIANTEP

    A bomb attack causing at least 50 deaths and nearly 100 injuries occurred at a wedding last night in Gaziantep; a city l ...

  • Chicot Report: Impunity for War Instigators

    According to Philip Geraldo, a former CIA counterterrorism specialist, “the people who provided false information about ...

  • When the Bahraini Regime is Allies with ISIS

    While the regime continues its repression against members of the opposition, especially from the Shiite community, we le ...

  • Algeria is the only barrier against the schemes of Zionism in Africa…

    We should always keep our focus when talking about the suffering of the Muslim world due to the threat caused by the Ame ...

  • If you are a Christian, then France is yours!

    On Tuesday July 26th, Father Jacques Hamel was shamefully assassinated in Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray Church by two ISIS te ...

  • Islam in France Under Supervision

    Following the terrorist attacks that shook our country during the summer months, restructuring the Muslims institutions ...

  • New Beginning for Erdogan’s Turkey

    While the failed coup of July 15th to over throw Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has yet to reveal all its secr ...

Towards a Moscow-Ankara axis?

reconciliationOn August 9th, Russian President Vladimir Putin received his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan in St. Petersburg’s Constantine Palace. This was Erdogan’s first foreign visit since the July 15th failed coup.

The latter offered “his friend” Vladimir a series of measures concerning the bilateral relations between the two countries. Relations which were strongly undermined after last November’s incident in which Turkey shot down a Russian fighter plane in the Syrian sky. The incident, which resulted in the death of a Russian pilot, revealed the profound differences between the two countries with regard to the Syrian crisis.

Indeed, while Moscow supported Damascus militarily, Ankara aligned itself with the West demanding the removal of President Assad and supporting terrorist groups in the country.

Today, 9 months after the crisis, the matter is forgotten and it is with a thinly veiled satisfaction that the “Tsar” of Moscow receives the “Sultan” of Istanbul who arrives in Russia with a request. A scene full of irony as we remember the arrogant attitude of Erdogan towards his Russian counterpart a few months earlier.

Meanwhile, a lot of water has gone under the bridges of Bosporus and the Turkish President, who nearly lost his life and power, is no longer sacred on the international level.

Erdogan was committed to making an apology at the end of June to President Putin for three main reasons:

The first is economic. Indeed, the sanctions imposed by Moscow against Ankara are beginning to have a serious impact on the Turkish economy.

The embargo on the import of agricultural products, cancelation of charter flights between the two countries, calling on Russian tourists to boycott Turkey as a tourist destination, administrative complications for Turkish companies based in Russia, and many retaliatory measures resulting in the collapse of trade between the two countries is affecting an already disturbed Turkish economy.

The second reason for this rapprochement is geopolitical. While Ankara is closely involved in the Syrian conflict including its logistical support to various jihadist groups, it obviously fears being the scapegoat in the US-Russian crisis which could lead to the establishment of a Kurdish entity on Turkey’s southern side threatening Turkey.

The last reason for this new start between Moscow and Ankara is the attitude of Putin who was one of the first world leaders to provide support to Erdogan during the abortive July coup. For the leaders of Western countries, this move seems remarkably out of line; allying with Turkey: a NATO member.

Indeed, Turkey was very disappointed by the reactions of its US and NATO friends who condemned the failed coup and criticized the way in which President Erdogan suppressed the perpetrators of the coup and their allies along with the purges that followed. All of this resulted in increasing the Sultan of Istanbul’s distrust in the west who supposedly give lessons in democracy. This distrust is now accompanied with strong anti-Americanism.

Indeed, Washington hosts Fethullah Gulen: the main defendant of the coup and refuses to deliver him to the Turkish authorities. This makes Ankara clearly see the involvement of the American services in the failed July coup. The Turkish authorities have more or less made this well-known on many official channels.

The Atlantics’ bickering is aimed at Moscow. They are trying to keep Russia under great tension by NATO’s non- stop provocation through amassing weapons and troops on Russia’s borders.

Are we witnessing a redistribution of cards? Will Erdogan’s disappointment push him to ally with Russia in a much more formal way?

Despite the certainties of some experts who believe such an alliance is unimaginable, the possibility of it happening is far from being neglected by Western officials. This is evidenced by the heavily tinted reactions from the American-Zionist countries, starting with Israel.

Indeed, the criminal entity, which announced a normalization with Turkey a few days before the coup, expressed its concern over a potential “new agreement” in the Middle East which included Moscow, Tehran, Ankara, Baghdad, Damascus and Hezbollah! A nightmare for the Zionist entity and its American big brother who is seriously considering withdrawing its nuclear weapons stored in Turkey.

Meanwhile, from an economic point of view, business is picking up. Moscow has ended the sanctions against Ankara and major joint projects are launched (the TurkStream gas pipeline and the Akkuyu nuclear plant)

From the Syrian crisis side, the trend is reconciliation. Two days after Putin and Erdogan’s meeting, Turkey accepted representatives from Assad’s government in the negotiations on the future of Syria and called upon Russia for a joint strike against ISIS. At the same time, the Turkish President stated in “the world” newspaper column that no solution is possible in Syria without the stepping down of President Assad.

Today, there appears to be a dramatic game of “Poker”. Even when the anti-Western attitude of Erdogan appears to be a bluff, it is clear that he has been strongly scalded by recent events which shook his country and that his confidence in the Western allies has been severely shaken.

The Anti-Zionist Party reiterates its wish to see Turkey joining Moscow in its support for the resistance axis and thus thwarting the Zionist project in the Middle East.

In alliance with Russia and the “Shiite” Iran, the “Sunni” Turkey could help accelerate the resolution of the Syrian crisis while at the same time destroy the Zionist plan for a frontal war between Shiites and Sunnis which is aimed at destroying the Muslim world.

yahia_gouasmi_05-300x200Yahia Gouasmi

Anti-Zionist Party President

© http://www.partiantisioniste.com/?p=13415

Attack in GAZIANTEP

turquie.attaque-la-bombe-contre-un-poste-de-policeA bomb attack causing at least 50 deaths and nearly 100 injuries occurred at a wedding last night in Gaziantep; a city located in south-eastern Turkey near the Syrian border.
 

The Turkish authorities believe that ISIS was probably involved in this despicable crime which was perpetrated by a suicide bomber.

It should be noted that the area affected by the explosion has a large Kurdish population, reinforcing speculation on a jihadist attack. As in neighboring Syria, the Kurdish militia clashes with members of ISIS.

Gaziantep has become the crossing point of many Syrian refugees fleeing the war in their country which has lasted for more than five and a half years. It houses refugees and a significant number of opposition jihadist activists.

The explosion in Gaziantep comes as Prime Minister Binali Yildirim announced that same morning that Turkey wanted to play a “more active” role in resolving the crisis in Syria to “stop the bloodshed.”

“Whether we like it or not, Assad is one of the players of the war in this country and it is possible to talk to him about the transition,” said Yildirim, expressing the new leadership taken by the Turkish diplomacy in the Syrian conflict.

The Anti-Zionist Party strongly condemns these despicable acts that touch innocents once again. We offer our sincere condolences to the families of the victims and to all the Turkish people; we call for unity against the provocation and division attempts.

yahia_gouasmi_05-300x200Yahia Gouasmi

Anti-Zionist Party President

© http://www.partiantisioniste.com/?p=13399

Chicot Report: Impunity for War Instigators

1026788443According to Philip Geraldo, a former CIA counterterrorism specialist, “the people who provided false information about Iraq prior to the invasion of the United States and Britain remain unpunished.”
 

On July 6th, 2016, the Commission of Inquiry headed by John Chicot, a former soldier, released its report on the involvement of the UK in the Iraq war. It concluded that the decision to invade Iraq, which was taken by the government led by the Labor Prime Minister Tony Blair, was a mistake.

This decision, which relied on false intelligence, incorrect estimates, and was adopted without being approved by the majority of UN Security Council members resulted in serious consequences, the effects of which are still felt today.

” (the decision) was based on a lot of false information provided by the United States and accepted, without critical examination, by Tony Blair, the British Prime Minister at the time”, said Philip Giraldi on the site “Sputnik “, adding that” no one would ever be punished.  “

According to him, “specific people must bear responsibility. And they are American, not British” ” Since the false and selective information given were mostly provided by the Pentagon, the persons responsible must be found. Their names are known to the public: Doug Feith, Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis “Scooter” Libby” said Mr.Giraldi.

At the time, Paul Wolfowitz was deputy secretary of defense, Douglas Feith undersecretary of defense for policy, and “Scooter” Libby, former adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney for national security affairs.

Previously, the US State Department had announced that it did not intend to study or comment on the commitment report of the British government in the Iraq war, considering the committee, chaired by John Chilcot, as an independent structure.

Following the publication of the Chilcot report damning the former British Prime Minister about his country’s military involvement in the 2003- 2009 Iraq war, it continues to claim to have made a good decision.

At a press conference following the publication of the Chilcot report, Tony Blair stated: “We made the right decision. The world is better and safer without Saddam Hussein,” then he added, rejecting the charge that the intervention in Iraq has increased the terrorist threat,” if the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein remained in power in 2003, he would continue to pose a threat to world peace. “

Recall that the US-British invasion of Iraq in 2003 was the main cause of the destruction of this country, the basis of the appearance of ISIS, and the abandonment of the endless violence that the Iraqi people endure.

The Anti-Zionist Party welcomes the release of this report which highlights the lies of the former British Prime Minister he used to justify the involvement of his country in the war against Iraq.
At the same time, it is distressing to note that despite obvious evidence: crimes against humanity, participating in the destruction of an ancient country, and being an accomplice in the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, he was not prosecuted and enjoys total impunity.
It is time to punish those originally responsible for the chaos in the Middle East; instead of being behind prison bars, they openly strut and give their advice.
There is no doubt that for its part history has already tried and convicted them.
 

yahia_gouasmi_05-300x200Yahia Gouasmi

Anti-Zionist Party President

 

© http://www.partiantisioniste.com/?p=13385

When the Bahraini Regime is Allies with ISIS

nasserbinhamadalkhalifa

Sheikh Nasser Bin Hamad Al-Khalifa

While the regime continues its repression against members of the opposition, especially from the Shiite community, we learn that the pseudo news agency “Aamaq”, belonging to ISIS, reported that the Bahraini prince joined a takfiri group.

The prince mentioned is 29-year-old Sheikh Nasser Bin Hamad Al-Khalifa, the fourth son of the king of Bahrain, who served as commander of the special guard of the Bahraini army.

This is the same person against whom a complaint was filed in 2012 in the United Kingdom following his participation in torture during his country’s uprising in 2011.

However, the English judicial authorities said that his diplomatic immunity protected him from any prosecution, which raised futile protests in the kingdom.

However, the Prince (of darkness …) fears nothing in France, as evidenced by his stay in our country during the summer of 2014 despite protests from several NGOs (non-governmental organizations) which demanded his arrest; the prince was not even questioned by the French authorities. Upon receiving the complaint, the crime against humanity division of the Paris prosecutor quickly closed the case after consulting the Foreign Ministry, invoking the immunity of the King’s son.

Today this billionaire torturer, joins the ranks of ISIS, for which he has the perfect profile: young, athletic, and a blood-thirsty psychopath.

 

It is strange that this information, which is certainly important, was not allowed to be taken over by our “Main Stream” media, even though we know that pseudo-takfiri press agencies are often used to confirming terrorist group claims. Unless this communication channel has a different set of reliability standards?

Nevertheless, this event, being presented as an isolated act, more clearly confirms the direct link between the Zionists Gulf monarchies and the pseudo-Islamic state.

 

The Anti-Zionist Party proposes to the Bahraini regime: instead of suppressing peaceful political opponents, they should start by getting rid of all their members which pose a threat to their country due to direct or indirect ties to criminal organizations.

At this time, our authorities should, instead of stigmatizing young French Muslims from immigrant families, prohibit these degenerate kings and Middle Eastern princes, who have proven ties to takfiri organizations, from entering our country.

 

yahia_gouasmi_05-300x200Yahia Gouasmi 
Anti-Zionist Party President

© http://www.partiantisioniste.com/?p=13373

Algeria is the only barrier against the schemes of Zionism in Africa…

We should always keep our focus when talking about the suffering of the Muslim world due to the threat caused by the American Israeli Zionism.

A conference for the African Union was held last week in Mauritania. The African Union, as is known by all, periodically holds meetings to discuss the union between African countries in order to better discuss its interests

What is astonishing is the Zionist issue, Israel wanting a seat in the African Union. Even if we accept Israel as a country, it is clearly not a part of Africa.

A few African countries, which support Israel, are starting to aid this idea; allowing Israel a seat in the African Union. At the end, they requested that Israel have an observer seat.

Netanyahu comments saying “It is true that this doesn’t meet our ambitions, but eventually and through our experience, we will have a seat in this union!

Of course, those who know how American-Zionist policies work in the region will not be surprised by these comments. However, what is surprising is the mentality of those who can’t identify their enemies’ plans, but claim to fight them.

Zionism doesn’t differentiate between Africa, Asia, Europe, America, or any other continent. Zionism and Freemasonry want to control the world one way or another.

In the beginning it used Britain, after the latter lost its power, it turned to the United States. Today it uses US policy in order to reach its own policies. Soon, it will also turn on the US which the Muslim world will witness. The question remains, whose hands does the Zionist policy want to use in order to achieve this?

Some of the countries which strongly opposed this Israeli move, a move which is supported by a number of pro-Israeli African countries, include Algeria and Egypt as well as a few others.

Algeria, in particular, took a stronger stand by sending delegates to each country in the African Union in order to explain the danger of accepting Israel as a member or even as an observer.
Algeria’s stand is supported by the African Union rules which don’t allow for a country that is not part of the continent to be a member, an observer, hold a seat, or have any type of legal status within the union.

Algeria’s position didn’t meet the approval of many, particularly Zionists, who began planning the conflict in the region a long time ago. This was made clear by Netanyahu’s statement “For decades we have said that we will reach what we want.”

© http://www.partiantisioniste.com/?p=13362

Rechercher

S’inscrire à la newsletter

une marche vers Jérusalem (Al Qods)

Sondage

facebook du Parti anti sioniste

Adhesion au Parti anti Sioniste

Adhérer  au  PAS

Réseaux sociaux

no comment !

No related posts were found